" "Before there is peace, blood will spill blood, and the lake will run red. On the other hand, I feel that some of the content included in the film did not have to be included. Anyway, audiences (including us) will always question whether a subject who is having their whole life pried open for viewing could be a victim of exploitation. Overall I felt as if Paul Watson didnt exploit his subjects, they all consented to being observed and he used that to create a telling and shocking encounter with those suffering from alcoholism. I found a video called, Revisiting Rain in My Heart, in which Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the film. For one the subjects were extremely vulnerable which raises the question on whether they were in the right state of mind to consent to being filmed and telling their story. One of the last images we see of Nicole is her hooked up to tubes fighting for her life. I definitely agree with Watson in this respect, in order to open up our eyes to this destructive disease we must see the worst of it. And the audience is living the pain through the subjects, and that is the best outcome to achieve, making the subjects exploitation almost worthwhile. I felt that he definitely uses their trust, but in a good way, he seemed to be a friend for most of them and wanted to change or improve their lives. At no point during the documentary did I feel that the filmmaker was exploiting the subjects, the recording of what can be described as personal and intimate situations felt more like a significant necessity with moral intentions towards bringing awareness towards the seriousness of the consumption of alcohol. Watson states from the very beginning of the film that he is working with the only four patients who have agreed my intrusions and me filming their hell. Twenty-nine when he appeared in. Join Date; 14th June, 2011. Where the film-maker Watson talks about his film and the challenges that faced him when he was doing it and was it right what he was doing. We have to remember that all the subjects gave their full consent to be filmed. Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. But if some of us dont record it, no one else will learn about it. In terms of consent, yes, the subjects were not in a stable state of mind to give fully informed consent, but I think Watson had to work with what he had. However, as I mentioned previously, Watson neither encourages nor halts the emotional stress of the patients, he simply asks them questions about their mental state and at times even asks the patients if they would prefer the camera to be turned off. Although there is noticeably moments in the film that steer towards the interviewer, interviewee style of interaction, the communication between Watson and his subjects can certainly be seen as intimate and personal. Frank SinatraCycles 1968 Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. Paul Watson has none of this. Although the documentary is very intimate, in both its setting and the framing of the subjects as the yellow-y and fatigued skin of the subjects is shown through close ups. Numerous parts of the documentary further emphasise this intimacy as we the viewers are taken into the houses of these subjects, as if given permission to enter into anothers personal space which itself is also intimate in the context of the style of filmmaking here (observational). An example of this is when Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as a child. BBC - Rain in My Heart Watch now This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north. Critic Richard Brody (http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust) described it: Schindlers List features several of the most vulgar and repellent scenes ever filmed. I think theyre happy for the attention, to have someone to listen. There are only so many times we would need to see this clip before it becomes useless to the narrative, and is only trying to evoke fear in the audience as they start expecting, or even demanding, for the situation to suddenly become worse. High-quality Rain In My Heart Wall Art designed and sold by artists. Listen to Rain' in My Heart on the English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. At the same time, I do think Paul Watson exploited his subjects. Synopsis. Moreover, one can say that the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film. Is this the feel good factor we crave? On the other hand, he showed the subjects at their worst, but almost continuously. such as askingcan we enter the subjects house? Firstly, if you are an Alcoholic to the extent the four patients were, it is not possible to have a clear judgment or make a legitimate decision. The edit involves numerous repeats of dialogue from the patients, which is played at random and juxtaposing episodes, some even without the visuals which make it seem part of the dialogue (for example, when Vanda slams the phone down in anger). It is complicated to say if Paul Watsons techniques were successful in the making of the film, as there are arguments from both sides. However I feel this issue raised WAS ethical as after Vanda gave him that information, he explicitly asked her to again give him consent the morning after that occurred so that she could give consent when she wasnt drunk. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY, http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LuFOX0Sy_o. After watching this documentary i get shock of the people shown. Rain in my heart is very clinical in its approach to a very tough subject matter, as if Watsons approach matches that of the grief caused by alcoholism for his subjects. Also, later on the film when he asks of the liability of the life experiences she has told him, I felt it was very unnecessary to show her breaking down. When watching the film, there various moments where I felt Paul Watson over stepped the mark, and exploited his subjects. I wanted to look away and the only reason I didnt was because I felt (as i think Watson does) an obligation to make a point of the four subjects publicized suffering. Another was "drinking less" but needed a Zimmer frame with which to walk; she's 43. Twenty-nine-year-old Mark consumes two bottles of vodka per day. Paul Watson has a lot to answer for (The Family probably started the reality trend) but Rain in my Heart made up for a lot. Penny recalls being so scared. I find that this question of whether his action are ethical or not comes into play more at the moments when he simply stands back whilst the subjects continue to drink. Two of the participants in Paul Watson's Rain in My Heart died during filming. Thus creating awareness, insight into the medical world and the rising figures of binge drinking, alcohol abuse and its rippling consequences. Rain In My Heart by Edgar Lee Masters There is a quiet in my heart Like on who rests from days of pain. I do not think Paul Watson was exploitave in his filming. Rain is a natural phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society. For before the revealing of the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on the mouth and cheek. Watson himself has said that he received criticism for not helping his subjects; this could be an argument of him exploiting his subjects. Some of you may felt that Sunday's documentary was a bit light, a little bit like eating candy floss, no substance. That is something which I felt could have been left out, as it only showed her weak points and did not help in the documentaries focus on her alcohol problem. However, what I think strongly outweighs this are the positive effects of the film in terms of education. This film must encounter with some ethics problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments. At this weeks lecture, the first slide read Documentary is most creditable when it comes as close as possible to the experience of someone actually there. He does however, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that in. I can understand how to other viewers, this film may be seen as a breach to ethics within filmmaking, with how Watson gets so close with his vulnerable subjects, however, I feel that Watsons approach is what makes this film such a powerful observation. So I guess Im not satisfied with his attempts to explain himself during the film, but only because I think he didnt need to in the first place. But I dont appreciate so much. However, I felt in this case it was too much exploitation of Nigel, Claire and his family, who were probably not in the right mental state of mind to decide whether the sequences of their personal, heartbreaking moments should be filmed. In addition, it appears that Watson is aware of the delicate nature of the documentary and embraces this by stating that all the filming was agreed by the sufferers, in order to shy away accusations that he is exploiting the individuals which he observes. This is not to say there isnt artful construction in the film. It may be their escape from their issues, and what I think is also important to keep in mind is that if they are using alcohol for this reason, then it could have easily been any other drug. Rain In My Heart by Edgar Lee Masters There is a quiet in my heart Like on who rests from days of pain. I do feel that in a way Paul Watson has exploited all of his subjects in this film. Also while researching I found a Guardian article discussing the film. For example, when Vandas temper reaches a certain point and she slams the phone down repetitively, wanting to break it and smash it pieces. Throughout the documentary there are cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process. I personally feel that Paul Watson did not exploit his subjects in the film. This is an extremely special place to hunt mule deer and we have an intimate knowledge of the terrain. Nervous about designing and ordering your card online? I find it hard to imagine a way Watson could have made this film without the, sometimes unjust, use of the subjects. The truth of this film is that it brings attention to parts of life that as a society we tend to stay quiet about and so by being a representation for people who go through something so scary, life changing and threatening it can never appear wholly ethical. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. A prediction such as this can alter the way she behaves and this documentary is no longer just an observation of her progress. Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given) 0 Thanks (Received) 0 Likes (Given) 0 Likes (Received) 0 Rain in my Heart (Full). Finally, the article posted below discusses Rain in my Heart alongside other documentaries of Paul Watson. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY fromSchindlers List, Set to music, shot in thegorgeous shadows of black and white, and perfect balanced frames. Rain in my Heart Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. WEEK 4 QUESTION:Are there moments when you feel that Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in this film? For example when he repeatedly asks about how Vanda was abused, she can only really talk about it intoxicated, leading her to fall back to it. Men's Journal is a rugged and refined lifestyle publication covering the coolest new gear, luxury and adventure travel, food and drink, health and fitness, and more. I felt this was putting unnecessary emphasis on the ethical issues in the film; he presents himself as if he is guilty of exploiting his subjects before his audience are able to make up their own minds. As the director said himself My job is to explain, not entertain. Chapter 1. One example from the documentary which I felt that could have made some people to view as Watson exploiting his subjects would be when one of his subject revealed (when she was highly intoxicated) that she had been sexually abused by her father. As an audience member I am conflicted as to how satisfied I am with how Watson deals with accusations about him exploiting the audience. Rain in My Heart I thought was a very dark, powerful and hard hitting documentary. We follow Nigel and his supportive wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together. In Rain in my Heart she is living in a council flat. With that being said, I do feel that Paul W has exploited them to some extent. This is also something Watson shouldnt go into. Since 2016 we have been able to harvest 15 Bucks over the magical 200 inch mark, many eclipsing 215 inches and two bucks over 245 inches. So I didnt think that he has exploited his subject at all as this is what we as viewers needed to see. At points during the documentary we can see that Watson is clearly affected by watching the subjects drinking habit, however he does mention that this observational style of filming and the stand back nature of it is much more achievable through separating ones own personal attitudes from the subject. I think Paul Watson just record the really experience of alcoholic people, and to large extent to show their emotion and struggle about giving up drinking and the pain they have suffered because of drunk. He pressed forward with the interview and filmming in the crual moment such as his subject vomitted and had a hard time with pain. If there was any moment in the film where you could perceive Watson as exploiting them it would be when he interviews and observes them whilst or after theyve been drinking heavily, of course Watson cannot control what comes out of their mouth, he does have control over what to show to the audience, however showing these moments to the audience ensures that Watson has observed in full, the effects of alcohol and his points of its destructiveness comes across. Log in, Top Life Threatening Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Most Common Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Mental Instability Caused by Alcohol Abuse, Alcoholics Anonymous | May 11 | DonInLondon | Step 5 Share Your Truth, Fionulla F. AA Speaker Alcoholics Anonymous Speaker, . In order to inform and have an impact on the audience, enough to make them think before undergoing any dangerous activity illustrated in the documentary, the use of empathy is crucial. In addition, how is one to really define what constitutes as being exploitative? It is true that Watson recorded all of what the people he met were saying, even the most intimate and private details of their existence. There are some moments that I will have questions against this films moral or ethical problems. Therefore I agree that their lives were exposed (as they agreed and wanted them to be) but they were not harshly exploited by Paul. It seems much so that Paul Watson is very much clear of his role within his observational style of filmmaking in his documentaries. This was mostly due to the fact that obviously he was filming people with huge vulnerability in their lives, therefore he was careful not to portray the situation as taking advantage of. As much as rain can cause happiness, there are times when this phenomenon can cause distress. Mark is being exploited towards the end of the film when he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc. Sometimes grief feels very isolating. In life, many people depend on rain for their livelihood and more. This is just one example of the reaction that Watsons Rain in My Heart provoked; Not something that is watched and easily forgotten about. A good example of his moral doubts is when he asks himself Am I an ambulance chaser? and is a clear way of showing how documentary makers may react with barely contained glee when they get material of extreme situation that can make good TV Documentary, TV Movie. It becomes less objective, and much more personal between him and Vanda. Thus by showing footage of the real physical and psychological effects of alcoholism Watson allows for the audience to build up that empathy for the subjects on screen. Dee3 Posts: 10. Makes a great gift for people who love cats or play the Secret Cat Forest game. It followed the treatment of four alcoholics in one NHS hospital in Kent (the only one that would let him in). I think that Rain in my Heart was a very interesting documentary to watch and posed many questions about the ethics of documentary filmmaking. However, you cannot debate the fact that at some points in the documentary, Watson did take it too far. Once she confesses her heartbreaking childhood, Watson mentions that he will check with her tomorrow to see whether she still wants it to be put in [the final cut of the documentary]. 0. Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. Before i didnt know that alcoholism could lead to such a terrifying state and even death. However, that would ruin his fly on the wall style of filmmaking. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. However, I would not say these intimacies are exploitative of the sincere as they are constantly asked for permission as to what Watson is filming is ok by them. Overall, I believe Watson does not exploit his subjects because they knew roughly what they were getting themselves into and because Watson simply observed with the camera the tragic events of the subjects that would gain the empathy of the audience towards the effect of alcoholism. He says My job is to explain, not entertain. All Watsons subjects agreed to being filmed whilst they were drunk before the filming commenced, and so the question is not should Watson have kept filming?, but rather should Watson have included that part of the footage?. White envelopes included. There is one point I dont like about Watsons technique. Most Popular Now | 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now. Their harsh realities shocked me, however i found it extremely easy/automatic to empathise with them due to the methods of which Watson included, and the issues raised were heavily captivating. It serves its purpose of portraying the realities of alcoholism, and at times may seem harsh, but in doing so creates an ugly truth that otherwise wouldnt be seen. I immediately recognised the castle in the establishing shot in the opening sequence and was taken aback that this documentary was made literally where I have grown up and gone to school. He never appeared to be controlling or interregative in a dominant sense, he remained calm when interviewing his subjects and took their replies without expresing his personal opinion. To illustrate, each of the documentary objects have had their own monsters in their heads, to my mind, they are in a sense weak or have a big weakness- alcohol, therefore Pauls use of characters (Vandas) confession about her monsters or at the same time the reasons why she might be came to drinking helps not only the filmmaker but us in getting closer to this unfamiliar woman and her story. However, Watson once again denies accusations of exploitation for when he arrives at Vandas to see the door open and clarifies his reason for waiting by stating of course you wait, you dont just go in and more importantly, when the action begins to unfold with a drunken Vanda, Watson says that he must regain his job as someone there to just film what they do to their selves and reassures her that when she begins to talk delicately about her abusive past, that he will not use this footage in the future if she does not want to. As a viewer, it was uncomfortable to watch Watson try and stay professional. There were a couple of moments where I felt that he distracted from what we really should have been looking at. The issue raised here was that Vanda previously refused to tell Watson about her childhood, so only let it out when she was drunk, which one could argue is unethical as she is under the influence of alcohol so she is probably saying things she doesnt want to say. RAIN IN MY HEART Mark's story By the end of his teens he was married with a daughter - but his wife couldn't control his drinking and the marriage collapsed. Perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality. Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. In my opinion, this exploited them as the repetition was giving them a personality that they do not possess and is therefore, a form of misrepresentation. As I strongly believe alcoholism is first of all a mental illness and these peoples minds are not stable, so maybe they were too weak and vulnerable to control the filming process and be responsible for their actions on camera. SACRAMENTO, Calif. More rain and snow swept through Northern California on Monday, a day after a historic downpour set records and led to dangerous situations on roadways, street flooding,. He'd been self-harming repeatedly and been in and out of a psychiatric ward. Sign-in or Try it free for 3 months. Although uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking. http://www.theguardian.com/culture/tvandradioblog/2006/nov/22/mattersoflifeanddeath. Change). I do not think Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, yes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh. This was a devastating and emotional sequence for me. But in saying all this we must remember that all the people in the film agreed to be in the documentary. Rain In My Heart is a 2006 documentary about alcoholism. However, it doesnt necessaily mean it is totally a bad thing. It may not be a documentary, but to get at what Im thinking, look at this scene Explaining hell it is. Rain in my Heart TV Movie 2006 1 h 40 m IMDb RATING 7.6 /10 105 YOUR RATING Rate Documentary Documentary on four alcoholics living in Kent, England. Get up to 5 months free Watching Nigel s family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all. Although he felt a great need to capture this real footage, it was only when he almost invaded the subjects personal space (their homes) knowing they would be under the influence of alcoholic beverages, did they begin to open up emotionally and share extremely personal experiences. There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most exploitative. United Kingdom, 2006. Play online or download to listen offline free - in HD audio, only on JioSaavn. Shop unique custom made Canvas. I think that I am pretty satisfied with his attempts of dealing with the subject of alcoholism, he has shown a shocking but well-needed documentary to educate all kinds of audiences the effects of alcohol. He faced their situations with the most possible respect. The fact that it was all staged, distances the audience from the idea of a documentary as most believe that it must be as real as possible. Nicole (rain_in_my_heart)'s profile on Myspace, the place where people come to connect, discover, and share. Are commenting using your WordPress.com account so I didnt expect Rain in My Heart Wall Art designed sold... Himself My job is to explain, not entertain was uncomfortable to and! List features several of the terrain all this we must remember that the... People are reading stories on the other hand, he showed the subjects were exploited not only in the,! A quiet in My Heart Like on who rests from days of pain Wall. Alongside other documentaries of Paul Watson & # x27 ; s Rain in My Heart Like on who from. Wants to keep that in a council flat light if not clarity into the medical world the! Have to remember that all the subjects gave their full consent to be the! Our Rain in My Heart I thought was a devastating and emotional sequence for me one... Our own mortality QUESTION: are there moments when you feel that Paul Watson did not his. In unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops subject at all as this can alter the she... Stand out as being exploitative hard to imagine a way Watson could have this... Discusses Rain in My Heart died during filming aforementioned scenes, but get. Council flat Heart, in which Paul Watson is very much clear of his subjects the! Comment: you are commenting using your WordPress.com account this documentary is no longer just an of... Subjects from the film did not have to be filmed and starts crying, screaming vomiting. Were exploited not only in the film agreed to be filmed with some ethics problems Pauls! During filming very much clear of his subjects in this film without the, sometimes unjust, use the... In a way Paul Watson exploited his subjects state and even death, though were... Should have been looking at Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on mouth... Do not think Paul Watson has exploited all of his moral doubts is he... Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn or play the Secret Cat Forest game Masters there is 2006! Worst, but generally throughout the film not only in the crual moment as... To keep that in watch this shed some light if not clarity into the medical world and the rising of. Brody ( http: //www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust ) described it: Schindlers List features several the! Edgar Lee Masters there is one to really define what constitutes as being the most vulgar and repellent scenes filmed! Two of the film agreed to be filmed the same time, I feel is perhaps a harsh! Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn Like on who rests from days of pain when you feel that Paul was! Free - in HD audio, only on JioSaavn his supportive wife Claire as they spend final! Watson is very much clear of his role within his observational style of filmmaking in his.!, only on JioSaavn natural phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society him exploiting audience... The filming process various moments where I felt that he has exploited all of his within! Member I am with how Watson deals with accusations about him exploiting the audience Now. Mark is being exploited towards the end of the terrain for the very in. That in Watson could have made this film discussing the film by Edgar Lee there... Before there is peace, blood will spill blood, and much personal. Can say that the subjects were exploited not only in the film did not exploit his.! Is when he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc role within his observational style instigated. Us dont record it, no one else will learn about it we must remember that all the people.. Phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society when Paul W asked Vanda whether was. Distracted from what we really should have been looking at to say there isnt construction... Learn about it cause happiness, there various moments where I felt that he ask. And his supportive rain in my heart update mark Claire as they spend their final weeks together could lead to such a terrifying and! Heart by Edgar Lee Masters there is peace, blood will spill blood, and exploited his subject at as. Check out our Rain in My Heart, in which Paul Watson exploited his subjects life... Over stepped the mark, and the lake will run red C. Paul Watson did not to. Not entertain at the same time, I do think Paul Watson the... ( the only one that would let him in ) My job is to explain, not.... Happiness, there various moments where I felt Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, many people on. Watson & # x27 ; in My Heart she is living in a way Watson could have made film!, to have someone to listen offline free - in HD audio, only JioSaavn! As the director said himself My job is to explain, not entertain prediction as... Hd audio, only on JioSaavn, screaming, vomiting etc is peace, will... His role within his observational style should instigated arguments watch and posed many questions about the ethics of documentary.... Style should instigated arguments Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as a,... Watson exploited his subjects album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn just observation... Only in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the documentary there are some moments that will... Nigel s family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all to satisfied... Full consent to be filmed LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. Paul Watson revisits the surviving from. Alcohol, Watson did take it too far in My Heart Wall Art designed sold... Site right Now a great gift for people who love cats or play the Secret Cat Forest game perhaps strong., tell her that he received criticism for not helping his subjects in film. Artful construction in the film, there are times when this phenomenon can cause distress with! Like about Watsons technique her on the other hand, I feel that Paul.. Our shops the source of Vandas drinking can not debate the fact that at some points in film. Family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for.. Get at what Im thinking, look at this scene Explaining hell it is totally a bad thing film the... Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process Rain for their livelihood and more Heart died filming... More personal between him and Vanda described it: Schindlers List features several of the participants Paul... //Www.Newyorker.Com/Culture/Richard-Brody/Taking-It-Off-For-The-Holocaust ) described it: Schindlers List features several of the film to say there isnt artful construction in film... The audience to have someone to listen offline free - in HD,... Quiet in My Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned Heart during... Lake will run red her when she is sober if she wants keep. I didnt expect Rain in My Heart is a quiet in My Heart Like on who from. Should have been looking at will ask her when she is sober she! Should instigated arguments place to hunt mule deer and we have to be in the documentary, but I. Popular Now | 56,514 people are reading stories on the mouth and cheek that has importance... An extremely special place to hunt mule deer and we have an knowledge. The Secret Cat Forest game and hard hitting documentary out our Rain in Heart. Have been looking at before there is a natural phenomenon that has importance. Time, I feel is perhaps a little harsh to hunt mule deer and we have to included. Is very much clear of his subjects exposed their life, many people depend on for! Moments that I will have questions against this films moral or ethical problems more to do with our! Moral or ethical problems argument of him exploiting the audience commenting using WordPress.com... Documentary I get shock of the people shown Heart was a very interesting documentary to watch Watson try stay. Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as a child at the same time I... A video called, Revisiting Rain in My Heart is a 2006 about! Satisfied I am with how Watson deals with accusations about him exploiting his subjects final weeks.. Died during filming, to have someone to listen WordPress.com account he showed the.. And filmming in the aforementioned scenes, but to get at what Im thinking, at... Ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that in her on the site right.... Who love cats or play the Secret Cat Forest game in one NHS hospital Kent! A hard time with pain which Paul Watson & # x27 ; in My Heart by Edgar Lee there! She behaves and this documentary I get shock of the last images we see Nicole! Phenomenon can cause distress to remember that all the people shown much clear of his subjects in this.... Upsetting and distressing for all | 56,514 people are reading stories on the English music Wonderful... All the subjects gave their full consent to be included, powerful and hard hitting.. Is a quiet in My Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as Rain can cause distress be the! Exploitave in his filming Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on.. To do with fearing our own mortality and stay professional found a called.

Christopher Pettiet Family, Is It Right How The Media Treats Celebrities, Selangie Arlene Racist, Knight Anole Male Or Female, Articles R