why is javascript interpreted rather than compiled

in the past, every programming language was fairly easy to categorize as one or the other, but the modern approach of running the source code created a sort of in-between area. Because of its popularity and pervasiveness, theres an abundance of educational material about JavaScript. Compiled language products are free to be executed directly. Help me understand the context behind the "It's okay to be white" question in a recent Rasmussen Poll, and what if anything might these results show? Note: Try editing your version of apply-javascript.html and add a few more buttons into the file. Note: In the external case, we did not need to use the DOMContentLoaded event because the defer attribute solved the problem for us. A single line comment is written after a double forward slash (//), e.g. In interpreted languages, the code is run from top to bottom and the result of running the code is immediately returned. But how about its interpreter? For this reason, you can only conclude that it is an interpreted language. In the above code examples, in the internal and external examples the JavaScript is loaded and run in the head of the document, before the HTML body is parsed. Centering layers in OpenLayers v4 after layer loading, The number of distinct words in a sentence. In theory, an interpreter would read the first line, print Hippity Hoppity and only then throw a Syntax Error. This is what interpreted languages want. Did you add your